12.7. Voiding Due to Gas Release from Failed Fuel Pins

The boiling model in SAS4A/SASSYS‑1 has been modified to account for voiding due to release of plenum gas from failed fuel pins. The main purpose of this modification is to address the question of whether pin failure in a transient that would otherwise not lead to boiling recovery would be prevented. Another case that can be addressed with this model is one in which pin failure occurs after the onset of boiling and increases the severity of the voiding. DEFORM-5 predicts the time and location of pin failure, or the user can specify the time and location of the pin failure. The gas release then provides a fictitious source of noncondensing vapor for the boiling model. An adjustable rip area and orifice coefficient determine the rate at which gas is released from the pins. Reduction in the plenum pressure is calculated as the gas flows out the rip. The gas fraction in each bubble in the coolant channel is calculated. The presence of gas in a bubble has two effects: it reduces the condensation coefficient and it increases the vapor friction factor. As the gas bubbles out the top of the subassembly a smooth transition is made to normal boiling. Three pin failure groups are used to account for incoherence. Each group represents a fraction of the pins. A separate life fraction is used by DEFORM-5 to predict failure for each pin group. Each pin group has a separate plenum gas pressure and temperature and a separate flow rate out the rupture.

For this model the rate of gas flow from the plenums to the coolant channel is calculated as

(12.7-1)wg=mfmA2(ppmpc)¯ρgmKg 

where

m= pin group number

ppm= plenum pressure for pin group m

pc = pressure in the coolant channel

A= rip area

Kg= rip orifice coefficient

(12.7-2)¯ρgm=ρgm+ρgc2

fm= fraction of the pins in group m

ρpm= gas density in the plenum

ρgc= gas density in the coolant channel

Note that for ppmpc and Kg ~ 2, Eq. (12.7-1) reduces to the expression for choked flow through as orifice, whereas for small pressure differences the equation reduces to the ordinary orifice flow expression.

Also, for a perfect gas:

(12.7-3)ppmVp=mpmRgTpm

or

(12.7-4)ppm=ρpmRgTpm

and

(12.7-5)ρgc=pcRgTgc

where

pc= pressure in the coolant channel near the rip

Tgc= gas temperature as it enters the coolant channel

ppm= plenum gas pressure

Rg= gas constant

Tpm= gas temperature in the plenum

The gas flow at the end of the time step is calculated as

(12.7-6)wg(t+Δt)=mfm(wgm1+Δpvwgm3)

where

t= time at beginning of step

Δt= step size

Δpv= change in coolant channel pressure during the step

(12.7-7)wgm1=A[ppm(t)pc(t)]2¯ρgm(t)Kg
(12.7-8)wgm3=A¯ρgmKg[ppm(t)pc(t)]2¯ρgm(t)Kg

The gas that comes into the coolant channel is converted into enough vapor to have the same pressure-volume product. Thus

(12.7-9)pgwgρgc=pvwvρv

where

wv= vapor source

pv= vapor pressure

ρv= vapor density

A conversion factor, γg between gas and vapor is defined as

(12.7-10)wg=γgwv

Then

(12.7-11)γg=pv/ρvpg/ρg=pv/ρvRg/Tgc

The temperature used for Tgc, the temperature of the gas entering the coolant channel, is the fuel surface temperature at the rupture node.

The treatment of the gas after it enters the coolant channel depends on whether it is entering a small, nonpressure gradient bubble on a larger, pressure gradient bubble. In a small, nonpressure gradient bubble the gas adds to the heat flow, Qes, from cladding and structure to the vapor:

(12.7-12)Qes(t+Δt)=Ie1+δIe1g+ΔTv(Ie2+δIe2g)+Ie3ΔZ(K,2)+Ie4ΔZ(K,1)

where

ΔTv= change in vapor temperature for the time

ΔZ(K,2)= change in lower bubble interface position due to change in bubble pressure

ΔZ(K,1)= change in lower bubble interface position due to change in bubble pressure

K= bubble number

Ie1,Ie2,Ie3,Ie4= contribution from normal vapor sources

δIe1g,δIe2g= gas source contributions

(12.7-13)δIe1g=λvγgAmfm[ppm(t)pc(t)]2¯ρgm(t)Kg
(12.7-14)δIe2g=λvδgApvTvmfm¯ρgm(t)KgKg2¯ρgm(t)[ppm(t)pc(t)]

λv= heat of vaporization

For a larger, pressure gradient bubble Eq. (12.6-45) gives a mass equation of the form

(12.7-15)C1,JΔp(J)+C2,JΔW(J)+C3,JΔp(J+1)+C4,JΔW(J+1)=hJ

For the mode J at which the pin rupture occurs the gas adds contributions to C1,J,C3,J and hJ:

(12.7-16)hJhJ+mΔtfmλgwgm1
(12.7-17)C1,JC1,J+d2
(12.7-18)C3,JC3,J+d2
(12.7-19)d2=mΔt2γgfmwgm3

The gas plenum calculations for a time step are done in two parts. First the effects of gas release are calculated. Then the heat flow from the cladding to the gas is accounted for as before.

The gas mass lost from the plenum in pin group m during a time step is calculated using

(12.7-20)mpgm(t+Δt)=mpgm(t)Δt(wgm1+Δpv2wgm3)

where

mpgm= gas mass in plenum for group m

Then the remaining gas in the plenum is expanded adiabatically:

(12.7-21)ppm(t+Δt)=ppm(t)(mpgm(t+Δt)mpgm(t))γ

where

γ= gas specific heat at constant pressure/specific heat at constant volume

The gas temperature, Tpgm, for the first part of the step is calculated as:

(12.7-22)Tpgm(t+Δt)=ppm(t+Δt)Vpmpgm(t+Δt)Rg

where

Vp= gas plenum volume

Then heat flow from the cladding is used to recalculate Tpgm(t+Δt) and ppm( t+Δt).

The amount of gas in each bubble is kept track of, and the gas fraction in a bubble affects the condensation heat transfer coefficient and the friction factor. The mass of gas, mgbk, in bubble k is calculated using

(12.7-23)mgbk(t+Δt)=mgbk(t)+Δtγgm(wgm1+Δpv2wgm3)

The total mass, mtk, in each bubble is calculated as

(12.7-24)mtk=ρv(z)Ac(z)dz

where

Ac= coolant flow area

The gas fraction, fgk, in bubble k is then defined as

(12.7-25)fgk=mgbkmtk

Gas stays in bubble until it blows out the top of the subassembly. When a vapor bubble extends far enough out the top of the subassembly, part of the bubble is assumed to break away and go up into the outlet plenum. If the bubble upper position, ziuk, exceeds the top of subassembly, ztsa, by an amount Δzbu (e.g. ziukztsa+Δzbu) then the part of the bubble above ztsa+Δzbl is broken off from the bubble. When this happens mgbk is decreased by the amount of gas in the part broken off:

(12.7-26)mgbkmgbkΔmg

where

(12.7-27)Δmg=fgkAcρv(ziukztsaΔzbl)

Then the upper interface of the bubble is moved down to ztsa+Δzbl:

(12.7-28)ziukztsa+Δzbl

Also, each time that the top part of a bubble is broken off, the velocity of the upper interface is cut in half. The condensation coefficient, hc, in a bubble containing gas is calculated as

(12.7-29)hc=hco1+100,000fgk

where

hco= normal vapor condensation coefficient.

Gas streaming in a bubble will have a different friction pressure drop than sodium vapor moving at the same velocity, so in this model the vapor friction factor is adjusted when gas is present in a bubble. The friction pressure drop, Δpf, due to vapor streaming in the coolant channel is

(12.7-30)Δpf=LDhfρvv2

where

f= friction factor

v= vapor velocity

L= length

Dh= hydraulic diameter

When gas is turned into fictitious vapor in the coolant channel, its pressure-volume product is conserved; so its velocity should be approximately correct. On the other hand, fission product gas has a higher density than sodium vapor, so the friction pressure drop will not be correct unless the density ratio is accounted for. In this model, the friction factor is adjusted to account for the density ratio:

(12.7-31)f=f0(MwgMwNafgk+1fgk)

where

f0= normal friction factor

Mwg= molecular weight of the gas

MwNa= molecular weight of sodium, taken to be 46